Ugh!

Although the Phillies are doing their best to ruin my taste for sport as a whole, we still plan to return soon.

Be on the look out...

I'll Be Back!

THE LEARNING PROCESS

Here at Lightning in a Bottle, we pay attention to those that have come before us and succeeded, and we learn from them, taking everything we can from them and using it to give you the best product possible.

It is with this in mind that I think back to the Seinfeld Episode when Kramer finds the set from the old Merv Griffin Show in the dumpster and transforms his room into the show. This is an absolutely brilliant episode, and also draws some stunning parallels to the Bolt. Kramer recreates the Merv Griffin show really with minimal expectations of it reaching anyone, to present something informative and entertaining to himself and his friends. And, if something were to happen that would enable it to be spread further outward, I'm sure he would have jumped on the opportunity, as it didn't look good for him ending his strike from the bagel place he worked at. After some time doing the show, Kramer realized it was time for a change. Even though there wasn't really much of an audience, doesn't mean he couldn't bring them the best product. When something gets stale, you do what you can to freshen it. He chose to get more edgy, modernize Merv Griffin with a touch of Jerry Springer.

WHAT I'VE LEARNED

Here at the Bolt, we know our audience isn't wide and our chances at success are minimal, but that doesn't mean you don't deserve the best. So it is in the mold of Kramer's Merv Griffin Show that we announce that The Bolt will be shutting down, while we consider its future aspirations. I did greatly enjoy briging my opinion on sports to whoever was willing to read it and I learned a lot about how I feel about sportswriting. Here is a synopsis:

1. I do love writing about sports in general. I would like to continue to try to do it.

2. Writing a blog where you are responsible for constant content daily, where you don't get paid, thus have to work full time at another job is difficult.

3. Along those lines, if you are responsible for constant content, you lose the ability to produce the researched, well-thought out, poignant, intellegent type of commentary that it what you really wish to be able to express. There is not enough time, and you end up getting very, very few articles like that, and a lot of just whatever you can scribble down in time.

4. The Dog Days of Summer provide very little to write about sports-wise. I love baseball, but without strictly becoming a specifically concentrated baseball blog or a team-oriented blog, what are you supposed to write about? (I know the trade-deadline, but that's it)

5. It is very difficult to increase readership.

Those are five observations that I have made. There are more that I can express if I think of them. I'll definitely come back to check on you guys during renovations.

THE NEW AND IMPROVED BOLT

Based on these observations, I've developed the following plan of action.

1. Close down the blog for now. The scheduled reopening will be late August or early September. It will correspond with a fertile time in the baseball season, story-wise, as well as the beginning of the NFL and College Football Seasons, with Hockey and Basketball not too far behind.

2. Look around for more people who would be interested in writing for a sports blog. If I want to put out the kind of product that people deserve to be able to read (see the epic previews to NFL playoff games, articles on crime in college sports or other things like that from the beginning of the blog), then I'm not going to be able to write as much personally.
I greatly enjoyed working with The BOMB and THE-A-TRAIN on this blog, but as I never asked them for any kind of committment to writing consistently coming in, it would have bothered me to require that of them at any point. As I'm sure you enjoyed their work as much as I did, they will be the first two writers on the list to join the staff of the blog upon its return. At that point we will ask every writer for a certain committment of content, either by week or by month or concentrated within a specific sport. The details are yet to be determined.
I will also be looking for new writers to bring on board to help pull the amount of material up to where it has been at times, without sacrificing the quality of the posts. If we can get 5-7 writers putting out a guaranteed 1-2 pieces per week, plus whatever else they want to contribute, and still keep on some of your LITB favorites (Sprites, Hottest Little Potatoes, Everyday Sports with Pierre Escargot, etc.), then we can really put forth a blog to be proud of.
Writers will be able to concentrate on games instead of having to worry about watching every one. We can feel free to attend games and report live, without missing 12 others sporting events we were supposed to write about. If someone needs a week off, there are other writers to fill the void.
I believe that with this kind of shared responsibility, we will be able to produce a blog with the kind of quality that dwarfs that of the first Lightning in a Bottle.

3. Come back with a fire to write again. Get it completely out of head that this blog is a chore. In the new format we can really just focus on our love of sports and sharing opinions. With the lessened committment, that enjoyment can be maintained, and it will certainly be felt within the content.

4. Once we've established a product that we are truly proud of, it will be time to try to step it up as far as readership. With more people on board we will a broader readership to begin with. We will have time to do cooperative work with other blogs, sharing readers, to get our names out there to anyone who will listen, more effectively use social networking: generally do what we can to get better.

THANK YOU

This is the plan and I think if it's done correctly, it can be great. I want to thank everyone that had been reading since January, when this blog was born. Just consider this a rough draft, and be ready for a well-polished masterpiece in the time to come. In return, I ask of you the following:

1. If you know anyone would might be interested in being a writer, get them in touch with me, so we can get the kind of commmitments we need to get this done the right way. Have them visit the blog and email the link, or if you know my contact information, feel free to give that out.

2. If you have any ideas, comments, criticisms that can be used to make the next version of this blog better, please let me know. Comment below or email the blog or tell me when you see me. I can take it, I promise.

3. When we come back with our renewed fervor, come back with yours. No blog is complete without the participation of its readership. Our readership is small for now, but that means we care even more abotu what you think. Fill up the comments section, email the blog. If you give us back a little, we'll give you back a ton.

4. Don't forget about us.....

Ravenously,

-APT

ON VACATION

Lightning in a Bottle is on Summer Vacation. Sadly it comes right at the start of Wimbledon and in the middle of the World Cup, but we will surely be back afterward to recap all the action we missed. But first, must make the most of the summer.

See you guys after the Independence Day Weekend.

-APT

NBA Finals Game Seven

In what was a sloppy, off-target, but intensely competitive Game 7, the Los Angeles Lakers emerged to repeat as NBA Champions. The Lakers trailed the entire 2nd half, until 7:29 was remaining in the 4th quarter. Ron Artest, without argument the best player on the court in Game 7, tied the game with a 3-point play. Seconds later Kobe Bryant game the Lakers their first lead since early in the 2nd quarter on a free throw. The teams, who both struggled to shoot, traded big 3-pointers late in the 4th, with the game close, but Pau Gasol's offensive rebound with under 30 seconds left pretty much sealed the deal. Gasol struggled from the line and Bryant struggled from all over the floor, but the two combined for 33 rebounds, as the Lakers won the rebound battle 53-40 (Kevin Garnett had only 3), which has been the key statistic all series. It was especially key this game, as the Lakers struggled greatly to shoot.

Ron Artest was the clear MVP of the game, with 20 pts, 5 reb and 5 stl, and smothered Paul Pierce, though The Truth did put up 18, including 6-6 from the line.

Kobe Bryant however easily took home the finals MVP award with an outstanding performance throughout. Even in this game, when he couldn't find his range, he went 11-15 from the line to help himself to 23 points, to go with his 15 boards.

Congratulations to the Lakers for pulling out a hard, HARD fought series, exactly the kind of series they needed to prove they could win.

-APT

NBA Finals Game Six

As I've said, analysis runs pretty shallow at this point in a series. Tonight's game was about energy. The Lakers were able to come home to the Staples Center, in front of what is sometimes an indifferent crowd, and generate the kind of energy to carry them to a huge victory. You could feel the Lakers energy and tenacity in the way their defense played, the way they rebounded, the way their bench played. The Celtics, on the other hand, were pretty complacent. About half way through the 3rd quarter, it became a matter of going through the motions and waiting for Game 7.

Three reasons the Lakers won.

1. Kobe had help: and he got it from a variety of sources. The Laker's bench outscored their Boston counterparts 24-0 during the minutes that mattered. They got scoring from Gasol, from Artest, a big all around contribution from Odom. Kobe came on strong in the first quarter with 11, but was able to cede some of the responsibility to his teammates later on.

2. The Lakers got back to playing inside. Andrew Bynum was much more mobile, Pau Gasol was spectacular early on.

3. Defense, defense, defense. LA held Boston to an NBA Finals low 67 points in the game. The Laker defense must have been on the same plane as that kid that accidentally ended up in Cleveland, because it was non-existent through most of the time in Boston. The Lakers looked revitalized in Game 6.

This was pretty much a throwback to Game 1, except the Lakers didn't need foul trouble to assist them. They were able to take the Celtic stars out of the game simply by playing tight on ball defense, constantly disrupting the rhythm of the offense. Pierce, Allen and Garnett all hit some open shots, but none were ever able to find a flow and it showed on the scoreboard. The Celtics were missing Kendrick Perkins, who sprained his knee fighting for a rebound in the 3rd quarter. It'll be important to track his health going into Game 7. He provides a defensive presence and a physicality inside, not to mention, much needed depth, when dealing with the Laker big men.

Some things to look for as we end this series.:

1. The team that has won the rebound battle has won every game of this series.

2. The team that has won the first quarter has won every game of this series.

3. In each game in this series, there has been a substantial contribution from the bench for the winning team. There is no mistaking the star power in this NBA Final, but it has been that extra push that has made the different game-in and game out. Shannon Brown in Game 1, Nate Robinson and Big Baby in Game 4, Lamar Odom in Game 6. The bench has been key all series.

As always, 3 things the Celtics need to do for Game 7:

1. Establish a 3 point threat. I feel like I've been saying this after every Celtic loss. It is no coincidence that when the Celtics don't hit 3s, the Lakers defense begins to smother them. The Lakers length is tremendously effective when they are able to collapse into the paint. If the Celtics can't show the threat of 3-point shooting, they will be dealing with twice the defensive team that they would have otherwise. They may get a minor blessing with Rasheed in the starting 5 rather than Perkins, as his jump shooting can stretch the Laker D if he shows it early. Ray Allen doesn't have to be what he was in Game 2, but he has to be some kind of a threat. Rajon Rondo is not a 3 point shooter, but he has to show that 2 point jumper that he worked on in the off season. If he can plant a few early, he will have much more room to operate in the paint. He can't allow Kobe to play 10 feet away from him, it creates too much traffic in the paint.

2. Get to the foul line. The fouls called have been mostly even in this series, but the Lakers end up at the line far more often. The Celtics have to be more aggressive on the attack in the lane and get to the line. Paul Pierce has to create. He has been guarded very well for about 2/3 of the series, but he can't let that render him inept. If he can't get a clean shot, he has to create contact.

3. Play with energy. This is not Boston anymore, and the Staples Center was rocking tonight. The Celtics have to come out with the kind of energy they had in Boston. They are a great road team, taking Game 2 of the series already. They have to show that ability to erase a home court advantage, to disrupt the interaction of the home team and crowd. They need to run when given the opportunity, but not be afraid to play the half court, slow the game down, and create impatience among the LA faithful. The Lakers were the better team in Game 6, but they also were the more aggressive, physical, tenacious, working team. These teams can match talent for talent. Finding that energy will bring the championship home.


-APT

Hottest Little Potatoes

HLP BATTERS

Josh Hamilton, Tex: 9/23, 7 R, 2 2B, 4 HR, 12 RBI, 2 BB, 5 K

Brandon Phillips, Cin: 13/22, 6 R, 2B, 3B, HR, 3 RBI, BB, 2 K, 2 SB

Carlos Pena, TB: 8/24, 9 R, 6 HR, 9 RBI, 2 BB, 7 K


HLP PITCHERS

Ted Lilly, ChC: 16.0 IP, 11 K, W, 0.56 ERA, 0.38 WHIP

Colby Lewis, Tex: 15.0 IP, 15 K, 2 W, 1.80 ERA, 0.73 WHIP

Mariano Rivera, NYY: 3.0 IP, 5 K, 2 Sv, 0.00 ERA, 0.00 WHIP


- Brandon Phillips showing the heat in all categories, but it doesn't hurt that he's batting .591

- Carlos Pena batting mere (by HLP standards).333 over the last 7, but we at Lightning in a Bottle understand that chicks dig the long ball, and Carlos Pena has his 6 bombs in the last 6 games.

- Ted Lilly would probably want us to shout out his Chicago counterpart, Gavin Floyd, whose no hit bid lasted just 1.1 innings less than Lilly. However, based on the "HLP Pitchers can't have a loss" precedent, we had to leave Mr. Floyd out this week.

- Mo Rivera was there to capitalize on the rules. A couple solid pitching weeks were contaminated by losses, and Mo only pitched 3 innings, which is less than we like out of our relief pitchers, but he was stellar K'ing 5 and giving up nothing.

- By the way, add up Ted Lilly's ERA and WHIP from this week: STILL UNDER 1.00. Not that it has to be, but that's a new automatic Hot Potato number (over 14+ innings)


-APT

Stat Lines of the Weekend

THE GOOD- Kevin Garnett, Bos; Sunday, June 13 vs. LAL: 6-11, 10 Reb, 3 Ast, 5 Stl, 2 Blk, 18 pts. Garnett's emergence has been the single biggest change in this series. Save one game that the Celtics won upon an ungodly shooting performance by Ray Allen, KG rejuvenation has been the reason the Celtics are able to win games.


THE BAD- Jamie Moyer, Phi; Friday, June 11 vs. Bos: 1.0+ IP, 9 H, 9 ER, BB, SO, HR


THE UGLY- Robert Green, Eng; Saturday, June 12 vs. USA: As we all know by now, the English goalie picked to start over the already notorious "Calamity" James, gave up, what could be, one of th softest goals in World Cup history. Clint Dempsey of the US team did well to separate enough to get a shot on net, but all the credit for the goal goes to Green's ineptitude. Green failed to center himself behind the shot and it bounded off the outside of his right arm and dribbled towards the back of the net, the US's only goal in a 1-1 match.


THE GREAT- Vincent Enyeama, Nig; Saturday, June 12 vs. Arg: The Nigerian goaltender was fantastic, as Argentina was forced to sweat out a 1-0 win, despite dominating the match start to finish. Enyeama made 6 mostly spectacular saves against the likes of Lionel Messi and Carlos Tevez. His performance was the single most stand-out of the World Cup Weekend.


THE PERFECT- Daniel Nava, Bos; Saturday, June 12 vs. Phil: 1 pitch into his Major League Career, Daniel Nava was perfect. He hit the first pitch he ever saw from a Major League hand deep to right center field for a Grand Slam. The 27 year old outfielder, who was cut from the Santa Clara baseball team, but stayed on as an equipment manager, has fought his way from the bottom, through the minor leagues, and made quite a splash in his Major League career, already.


THE BIZARRE- Ted Lilly, ChC/Gavin Floyd, CWS; Sunday, June 13 vs. each other: The two pitchers both took no-hit bids into the 7th innings, Floyd losing his (and the game) after 6 2/3. Lilly continued into the 9th but gave up a single to Juan Pierre before recording an out, and left the came, allowing Carlos Marmol to clean up for the save.


-APT

NBA Finals Game 5

There's not a whole lot to analyze as these series go deeper and deeper. The teams know each other and it just becomes a matter of execution. The Celtics dominated Game 5 on both ends of the floor. Did the Lakers have a chance? Sure. Why? Two reasons.

1. Sometimes you cannot stop Kobe regardless of the defense you are playing.
2. Rajon Rondo had a bigger turnover game than he had been this series.

In the third quarter, there was no way to defend Kobe. He hit every shot that was available and several that weren't available. Kobe's mastery was enough to keep the Lakers close, but he can't do this by himself.

The Celtics interior defense has improved every game of this series. They still allow some easy baskets to Bynum, but it usually involves a precise set-up by one of the Laker playmakers. Kevin Garnett has found youthful legs to use in Boston for games 3-5, not only establishing himself as a real scoring threat, but reinventing himself defensively, allowing Doc Rivers to leave him on Pau Gasol. And if the Celtics need to guarantee the inhibition of Gasol, Rasheed Wallace has devoured him.

As has been mentioned, late in the series, it is no longer time for a new game plan, it is a time for execution. The Lakers will have the opportunity to win an NBA Championship by taking care of business at home. Though one slip up and they fall to Boston for the second time in three years. With Game 6 just hours away, three thigns:

1. Ron Artest was sluggish in Game 5. Artest was pretty much the only person unimpressed with his defensive efforts in the first 4 games of this series. He promised to come out with a renewed fervor in Game 5, and play the kind of defense he is used to playing. Artest did exactly the opposite. He was slow getting around screens all night, and Paul Pierce was finally able to use the pick and roll to get himself scoring opporunities, having his best night of series. Ron Artest has to ignore his lack of production offensively and focus on Paul Pierce. If he comes out with rejuvenated, as we expected in game 5, it will go a long way toward a Laker win.

2. Wear down Kevin Garnett. Andrew Bynum needs to be healthy. With Bynum healhty, the Lakers are more physical. That physicality was debilitating to Kevin Garnett in the early games. Back in LA, KG was having little impact. Andrew Bynum needs to be a physical force in the middle, banging around in the paint, putting pressure on the old legs of the Celtics. On that same note, the Lakers need to get the ball inside consistently to Pau Gasol. I know his offensive production has fallen short in the last couple games, but they can't let that shut the idea out of their mind. Forcing KG to play defense every other time down the floor will hamper his abilities on the scoring side. They need to attack him and knock him out of rhythm.

3. Kobe Bryant needs scoring help. Kobe will be Kobe, but he can drop 60 points in this game and the Lakers can still lose. Some say they need that second big threat, but I think the Lakers need that little bit from everyone. I have been a supporter of pushing the ball down to Gasol, but the Laker offense is even more effective if they are getting 8-10 from Odom, Artest, Farmar, Brown and Bynum. Kobe is going to take over parts of this game, but he needs to use that take-over ability to his advantage, as it will free up his teammates. Kobe, in my opinion, is the best player in the NBA, but no one can do it alone.

-APT

World Cup Prediction

I had been asked to put forth a World Cup Bracket Prediction. I filled out a bracket on ESPN last week, but had forgotten to throw it up. So, for all those interested, here was my best guess, greatly influenced by my Italian bias, I must admit.

GROUP GRADUATES

Group A

France
Mexico

Group B

Argentina
Nigeria

Group C

England
USA

Group D

Germany
Ghana

Group E

Netherlands
Cameroon

Group F

Italy
Paraguay

Group G

Brazil
Portugal

Group H

Spain
Chile


SECOND ROUND

France def. Nigeria
England def. Ghana
Argentina def. Mexico
Germany def. USA
Paraguay def. Netherlands
Brazil def. Chile
Italy def. Cameroon
Spain def. Portugal


QUARTERFINALS

England def. France
Argentina def. Germany
Brazil def. Paraguay
Italy def. Spain


SEMIFINALS

Brazil def. England
Italy def. Argentina


FINALS

Italy def. Brazil


-APT

NBA Finals Game 4

I know I have been coming hard with game by game analysis of the Finals, but sadly my focus was distracted last night. From what I was able to gather this see-saw battle was decided by the tenacity of the Boston Celtics bench. Despite picking up 2 technical fouls, the foursome of Rasheed Wallace, Glen "Big Baby" Davis, Tony Allen and Nate Robinson led the Celtics on a 4th quarter run to put the game out of reach and even things back up at 2-2. I've read how big a risk Doc Rivers took by leaving his bench out there. I feel like it was an easy decision. Granted, Doc should still be commended for sticking to his guns and ignoring the names and numbers on the jerseys, as some would not do the same.

For the sake of consistency, here are 3 things for the Lakers to focus on in Game 5, even though I did not get enough of Game 4 to know exactly what they were donig wrong.

1. Don't forget about the inside game in crunch time.

2. Andrew Bynum should guard Kevin Garnett when the starting 10 are on the floor.

3. Keep eyes open when slashing to the rim. Take advantage of the collapsing defense on a Kobe or Fisher drive. Especially when Jordan Farmar or Shannon Brown are available on the perimeter, look for the kick and the easy 3.

-APT

The Chicago Blackhawks

A BELATED CONGRATULATIONS

to the Chicago Blackhawks. The Hawks finished off the Philadelphia Flyers in Overtime of Game 6 Wednesday night to win their first Stanley Cup in 49 years.

All analysis is useless at this point, as the names are etched on the cup. So let's just let the Blackhawks enjoy their moment and leave the Flyers in peace, without scrutinizing their difficult defeat.

-APT

WORLD CUP PREVIEW – PART 2

Group E

Featuring: Netherlands, Denmark, Japan, Cameroon

Most intriguing game: Cameroon vs. Denmark (June 19)

Thoughts: This is another intriguing group that somewhat resembles Group B. The Netherlands is the strongest team in the group and should have no problem advancing. They aren’t as talented in the back as they have been in past years, however they are still solid and boast some of the most electric forwards in the tournament in Arjen Robben and Robin van Persie. Robben is coming off an injury suffered in a friendly last week, however, so it remains to be seen if he will be in top shape. Even without him, the Dutch are talented enough to make it through to the second round at least.

Denmark returns to the World Cup after missing out in 2006, and they are hoping that 33 year old striker Jon Dahl Tomasson has enough left in the tank to lead them into the knockout stage. They likely will need to get past Cameroon in order to advance, which certainly isn’t a given.

Speaking of Cameroon, they are also back after missing out on the party in Germany four years ago. They also feature an elite striker in Samuel Eto’o, who had a bit of a down year with Inter this season, but is just one year removed from netting 34 goals for Barcelona. With opponents focusing their attention on him, Cameroon will likely need other players to step up if they want to see the round of 16.

Unlike the previous two teams, Japan did make an appearance in Germany, although it was one they would like to forget. They only managed a scoreless draw in their three group matches, certainly a disappointing finish after making it to the second round as co-hosts in 2002. As a matter of fact, they have never won a World Cup match outside of that 2002 run, so needless to the say they are the clear underdogs of the group.

Prediction: I have had practically every African team advancing to the second round thus far, and Cameroon is one of the stronger teams on the continent. So I see them joining the Dutch in the second round.


Group F

Featuring: Italy, Paraguay, Slovakia, New Zealand

Most intriguing game: Italy vs. Paraguay (June 14)

Thoughts: This is without a doubt the weakest group in the tournament, as Italy and Paraguay should have no problem taking care of Slovakia and New Zealand. Italy of course will be defending its title, but this team is not as strong as they were four years ago. This is mostly due to the fact that they are four years older, and seem to be lacking in younger players that can provide the veterans with a spark. They are of course still very talented, and this should be more than enough to push them through.

Paraguay has been one of the most consistent South American teams over the past couple decades, and seem poised to finally make it past the round of 16 this year. If they can take care of Italy in their first match, they can lock down the group and perhaps find themselves with a favorable matchup in the knockout stage. They most likely will need top striker Roque Santa Cruz to overcome his recent struggles if they want to go deeper into the tournament.

Slovakia will be making their first appearance in the World Cup as an independent nation, and while they are not the weakest team in this group (by a mile), they would probably be the weakest team in about half of the other groups. They will certainly need to steal points from either Italy or Paraguay if they want to move on to the second round.

New Zealand is without a doubt the weakest team in the tournament, which means they should be that much fun to root for if they manage to pull off an improbable upset. The chances of this happening are slim, however stranger things have happened.

Prediction: Seeing Slovakia or New Zealand make a run would be quite memorable, however it seems quite likely that Italy and Paraguay will emerge from Group F (though not necessarily in that order).


Group G

Featuring: Brazil, Portugal, Ivory Coast, North Korea

Most intriguing game: Portugal vs. Ivory Coast (June 15)

Thoughts: One of these teams is not like the others. The 2010 edition of the “Group of Death” is somewhat diluted by the presence of North Korea, one of the weakest teams in the tournament. However that shouldn’t take away from the quality of the other three teams in the group. Brazil is considered by many the favorite to win it all, and not without good reason. This team is absolutely loaded, and it all starts with Kaka in the midfield. He and his fellow Brazilians will be looking to leave their mark on this World Cup after their disappointing finish four years ago.

Portugal also have high hopes after reaching the semifinals in 2006, and they will look to Cristiano Ronaldo to lead them deep into the tournament once again. There are a few groups in which they would be the top team, yet they had the bad fortune of landing in a group where there is a realistic chance they may not advance. It will most likely hinge on their game against Ivory Coast. If they stumble, then they will likely need points against Brazil and a rout of North Korea to move on.

The Ivory Coast is a serious threat to the two elite teams in this group, but in order for them to make some noise they will need to have Chelsea striker Didier Drogba on the field. Drogba broke his arm in a friendly last week, and his status is still uncertain for the World Cup. Unfortunately for the Ivory Coast, their most critical match comes first, against Portugal. If he is unable to play against Portugal, the Elephants could be looking at an early exit.

North Korea are the likely whipping boys of the group, although they have a history of scoring upsets at the World Cup (such as their 1-0 win over Italy in 1966). Soccer is a sport in which it takes only one crazy bounce to open the door for an underdog, so perhaps North Korea will be the beneficiary of such a bounce.

Prediction: It is tough to pick the Ivory Coast to move on without Drogba, although they are still a talented team without him. Either way, look for Brazil and Portugal to move on.


Group H

Featuring: Spain, Chile, Honduras, Switzerland

Most intriguing game: Spain vs. Chile (June 25)

Thoughts: The final group is home to another major favorite in South Africa, Spain. The Spaniards have been arguably the top team on the planet since the 2006 World Cup. After dismantling Poland 6-0 in their final tune-up the other day, they look ready to make a deep run. There are some concerns that Fernando Torres may not be in top form coming back from an injury, but even if he needs a few games to shake the rust off, this team should still have no problem winning the group, as Chile is their only serious threat.

Speaking of Chile, they finished second in the gauntlet that is COMNEBOL qualifying, finishing only one point behind Brazil. This will be their first World Cup since 1998, and this is a hungry young team that is prime for a breakthrough. Look for them to give Spain all they can handle in the final game of the group stage. If they prevail in that match, look for them to use that as a springboard to a deep run in the tournament.

Honduras is making only its second appearance in the World Cup, and is a surprisingly old team for a group making its first World Cup appearance in 28 years. There are some talented players on roster, like midfielder Wilson Palacios, but they need to play some inspired soccer if they are going to make it through to the second round.

Finally, rounding out the field of 32 is Switzerland. They are going to need their star, Alexander Frei, to recreate some of the magic he displayed during 2006 if they want to make it to the kockout stage for the second consecutive tournament. They get the first crack at Spain, so if they can manage a draw (or better) that might give them the confidence to knock off the other two denizens of Group H.

Prediction: Spain should win this group, and Chile is a good bet to make it to the round of 16 as well. However don’t count out the other two teams, as Chile hasn’t exactly proven itself on the national stage.


I will wait until the knockout bracket is set before making those predictions, however I will say that I’m feeling that this might be Brazil’s year…again.


To quote the great soccer fan Porky Pig (I may not be able to back that up)….”That’s all folks!” Enjoy the world’s greatest sporting event…I know I will.

-The BOMB

WORLD CUP PREVIEW – PART 1

The grandest sporting event in the world kicks off on Friday, so it would be inexcusable of us to not offer up a preview of the action. Today I’ll preview groups A-D, then tomorrow I’ll (slide) tackle the latter four groups. Without further ado…


Group A

Featuring: France, Mexico, Uruguay, South Africa

Most intriguing game: South Africa vs. Mexico (June 11)

Thoughts: This is perhaps the most deceptively treacherous group in the entire tournament. The big name for sure is defending runners-up France, although they are an aging team that is not the threat to make a deep run in the tournament that they have been in past years (a 1-0 loss to China in their final tune-up last week speaks to this). And don’t forget about the fact that they might not even be in South Africa if it weren’t for Thierry Henry’s “Le Hand of God” goal against Ireland during qualifying. With that said, they are still a very talented team that features one of the top players in the world, Franck Ribery, and they certainly would love to prove all their doubters wrong.

The strongest team in the group may be Uruguay, led by accomplished striker Diego Forlan. South American teams are generally tough outs in the World Cup, and this team certainly is no exception with their aggressive style of play. France needs to be ready for them otherwise they could find themselves in a big hole after Day 1.

Mexico will be looking to move through to the Round of 16 for the fifth consecutive tournament, and they definitely have the horses to do so. Led by veteran defender/midfielder Rafael Marquez, the Mexicans have looked impressive in their tune-up matches, including a 2-1 victory over defending champion Italy last week. They do draw the unenviable task of playing the host nation in the first match of the tournament, however, so this could potentially be a serious hindrance to their advancement.

South Africa is by far the weakest team in this group, and many expect them to become the first host ever to not advance past the group stage. This certainly is a realistic scenario, however while their group is strong overall, it does not possess a single elite team. Their first game against Mexico should tell us everything we need to know about this team. Personally, I expect them to pick off Mexico and possibly France en route to the knockout stage.

Prediction: If Mexico falls to South Africa, they are probably done. I also think France is due for a disappointment this year. This leaves Uruguay and the hosts as the survivors.


Group B

Featuring: Argentina, Nigeria, South Korea, Greece

Most intriguing game: Nigeria vs. South Korea (June 22)

Thoughts: Until further notice, this group belongs to Argentina. They are the class of Group B on paper, and should have no trouble advancing, despite their lackluster qualifying campaign. Having the best player in the world certainly helps, and Lionel Messi is certainly on top of his game coming off a season in which he scored 45 goals in 46 games for Barcelona, including 8 in the Champions League. Perhaps the only thing that can derail Argentina is their coach, Diego Maradona, who is considered by many experts as one of the weakest coaches in the tournament.

After Argentina, the second ticket out of the group is pretty up for grabs. South Korea probably has the best shot at it, as this will be their seventh consecutive appearance in the World Cup (including their run to the semi-finals as host in 2002). Led by Park Ji-Sung, the South Koreans most important match may be their group finale against Nigeria, although getting a favorable result against Argentina certainly wouldn’t hurt their chances of advancing.

Speaking of the Super Eagles, they are making their first appearance in the World Cup since 1998, and will look to their strikers to give them an edge in what should be a very defensive-minded group (outside of Argentina). One particularly explosive option up front for Nigeria is Obafemi Martins, who scored two goals in their berth-clinching win against Kenya in qualifying.

Rounding out the group is Greece, who despite making only their second appearance ever at the World Cup are certainly a threat to advance to the Round of 16 as well. Their defense under coach Otto Rehhegal is always top notch, but they will need to find a way to score more goals if they want to move deep into the tournament. This strategy helped them win Euro 2004, but ever since then Greece has struggled in high profile competitions as teams seem to have their counter-attacking ways figured out.

Prediction: As stated above, look for Argentina to win the group, and look for the winner of the Nigeria-South Korea game to move on as well. My guess is that Nigeria scores another win for the host continent.


Group C

Featuring: England, United States, Algeria, Slovenia

Most intriguing game: Algeria vs. Slovenia England vs. USA (June 12)

Thoughts: A lot has been made of the England-USA game on Saturday, mostly because of a game played between the two sides 60 years ago. Yes, that was a monumental win for US soccer, however its significance is muted by the fact that the US didn’t return to the World Cup for another 40 years. This time around, first place in Group C will likely be at stake, and it should be a good test of how far the US has come since their disappointment in 2006.

England is the clear favorite of the group, and even if they slip up against the US they should be able to rebound against weaker sides Algeria and Slovenia. With players such as Wayne Rooney, Steven Gerrard and Frank Lampard back for another go, England fans have realistic dreams of watching their boys host the World Cup trophy, and anything less will certainly be a disappointment.

The United States also have high hopes for this World Cup, after knocking off Spain and giving Brazil all they could handle in the Confederations Cup last year. This team still doesn’t match up with the top teams in the tournament talent-wise, but they are getting there. Landon Donovan is viewed by many as one of the better players in the world when he is in top form, and the rest of the squad features a handful of players that have made their mark playing in Europe. Despite this, the US will need to be nearly tactically flawless if they want to progress deep into the tournament.

Algeria provided a bit of a shocker when they defeated Egypt to earn the last African berth in the tournament. Not viewed by many as a threat to advance, the Desert Foxes will depend on a stout defense and solid play in the midfield to get them through. The pressure will be on striker Abdelkader Ghezzal to get the job done up front. If he fizzles, Algeria’s stay will likely be a short one.

Slovenia on the other hand is a more serious threat to England and the US’s place in the knockout stage. Slovenia knocked off Euro 2008 semifinalist Russia in order to qualify, so this is a team that shouldn’t be taken lightly. They gave up the second fewest goals during European qualifying, so if they can find some goals up front they could very well end up advancing. Keep an eye on Milivoje Novakovic, Slovenia’s main threat up top.

Prediction: Algeria has the potential to be a nuisance and Slovenia’s defense will give teams problems, however England and the US should make it through as they are the group’s best teams.


Group D

Featuring: Germany, Ghana, Australia, Serbia

Most intriguing game: Ghana vs. Serbia (June 13)

Thoughts: This is another group that doesn’t look too stacked to the untrained eye, but in reality each one of these teams has a realistic shot at making it through to the second round. Germany is understandably the favorite, but there are definite question marks surrounding the team. They will be without star midfielder Michael Ballack, who was injured at the end of the Premier League season, and this will be their first World Cup without the brick wall that is Oliver Kahn since 1998. They still sport a dangerous attack, however, so they should still emerge from Group D.

Ghana will be looking to duplicate their success from 2006, and with a crop of impressive young players that won the under-20 World Cup just last year, they are again a talented team that could potentially explode into the second round. They will be without injured star Michael Essien, but German transplant Kevin-Prince Boateng should be able to step in and solidify the midfield next to Steven Appiah. Their match against Serbia may be the key to them returning to the round of 16.

Serbia is a team that is stocked with talent but is lacking in equivalent success in recent tournaments. As Serbia and Montenegro in 2006, they were eliminated without winning a single game, and they didn’t even qualify for Euro 2008. This is a dangerous team, however, especially in the midfield, and a run to the second round isn’t out of the question.

Finally, Australia is probably the weakest team in the group, but they are still a strong side that has the potential to spring an upset or two (as they did in 2006). Led by Tim Cahill, the Socceroos have a stiff task ahead of them, but they are a veteran team that may be able to take advantage of some of the inexperienced players in the group. Goalkeeper Mark Schwarzer is a gamechanger in net and could steal a game or two for Australia.

Prediction: Ghana and Australia may have trouble rekindling the magic from 2006, so look for Germany and Serbia to break through to the round of 16.


-The BOMB

Part 2 still to come...

Strasburg's Night

Steven Strasburg put together a hell of a debut, to please the countless hypers that have been doting on him.

7.0 IP, 2 ER, 4 H, 14 K, 0 BB, 94 Pitches

I just buzzed through the 7 innings of Strasburg pitching and he certainly is impressive. He consistently through 97-99 with his 4-seamer. The 2-seamer was 95 and 95. His curveball is incredibly dynamic, very hard and very sharp-breaking, and he threw a change up that, when it worked, fell right off the table. It was only the pirates, but it was no fluke that he struck out 14 hitters. The Pirate hitters were able to adjust to the fastball the second time around the order, and were not helpless against the changeup (Delwyn Young hit one over the right field wall) but they were hapless, hopeless and helpless against that curveball. It reminds me a lot of Kerry Wood's power curveball, when it was great, and a little bit of Adam Wainwright. What was crazy was how, for the late 2nd, early 3rd time through the batting order, the hitters were once again lost on the fastball. This was the impact that the curveball has. Strasburg also set himself up for strikeouts later on, by being consistently accurate in the strike zone with the fastball early. This led Pirate hitters to chase the fastball up in the later innings (Strasburg struck out the last 6 hitters he faced, most on fastballs).

He is a long way from Cooperstown, but the kid surely will be fun to watch.

Note

The Bolt is curious what happened to Chien-Ming Wang. All this Strasburg talk, and the possibility of trading for Roy Oswalt has put the Wang acquisition completely on the back burner. I will look into what's going on with Wang's rehab and get back to you all in the next MLB Sprites.

-APT

NBA Finals Game Three

Some quick analysis as Game 3 comes to an end, with LA taking back home court by stealing the first game at the TD Garden. This series has been great to watch, as the stories are coming from different places every game.

Let's not focus on the negatives from todays game. We all saw Kobe's cold shooting night, Ray Allen's non-existent shooting night, more questionable officiating, etc. But there are some major performances that merit mentioning.

Formerly in Absentia.

Each team seemed to pick up a free agent between games 2 and 3. Whoever was wearing number 5 for the Celtics must not have been in LA. Kevin Garnett was moving like he had a week off, when in reality this was his shortest turnaround between games. The Celts got him involved early with easy buckets. KG took that confidence and added an increased agility in the low post to put together a huge night when the Celtics needed it. Lamar Odom finally showed up for the Lakers. He shot 5-5 from the field, adding some rebounds and solid defense.

Tighten it Up.

Defense was the story of this game. The Lakers played great defense all game long. Everyone on the floor was involved. Not only Andrew Bynum and Pau Gasol were affecting shots, but Kobe Bryant had multiple key blocks, and Shannon Brown and Lamar Odom were altering looks. Derek Fisher also drew a couple of offensive fouls, and Ron Artest once again played great defense on Paul Pierce, and made a big play late stealing poking the ball away twice, leading to a turnover. The Laker length crowded the floor, giving the Celtics little room to operate, as Boston once again longed for the threat of outside shooting. The Lakers even jumped out to block multiple three point attempts. The Celtics also played magnificent defense while coming back in the second half. They were tremendously disciplined, squaring up the Laker ball handlers one-on-one. Tony Allen was great against Bryant in the 3rd quarter. Although I still think the Lakers underused Pau Gasol in the second half, I thought the Lakers did a much better job denying him prime position. If there was a stat for average distance from the basket, when receiving the ball in the post, Gasol's ADFTBWRTBITP was probably a foot further, at least in Game 3. Rasheed Wallace was especially strong denying post positions, and Kendrick Perkins was excellent defending upon post entry. The Celtics also made several deflections on attempted entry passes. Overall they were much improved defending the Laker bigs.

Fresh Off the Bench.

I thought Luke Walton did a great job in the first half for the Lakers. Ron Artest got 2 quick fouls and had to sit. This could have been a spectacular opportunity for Paul Pierce to finally get something going offensively. But Walton was very disciplined defending him and adjusting on pick and rolls. Pierce later piled up his own fouls, and thought hitting 3 3s and a big bucket late, he still is struggling to find a rhythm from the get-go of these games. Walton added a few points, but more importantly kept Pierce off that rhythm. Glen "Big Baby" Davis, again, was a key contributor for the Celts. He was incredibly tough in the post, using power moves to work through position against the longer Laker defenders toward the basket. He also, once again, brought high energy play to the floor. Big Baby brought down all of his rebounds emphatically, working the crowd and scrambling for loose balls.

Ice in the Veins

The main story of this game, however, was Derek Fisher. Fisher showed why he's not the only Laker guard that has won 4 championships. On a poor shooting night for Kobe, when the Celtic defense was holding strong, Fisher used the pick and roll to continually drive hard left and either push to the rim or pull up and bank a tough shot home. Fisher has never been afraid to take a big shot. He took many today. Fisher finally sealed the game running the floor against a Celtic transition defense who seemed half-hearted (despite there being plenty of time), turned hard around Kevin Garnett, drove strong to the hole, and despite getting clobbered by Glen Davis AND Ray Allen, softly dropped the ball off the glass, and confidently completed the three point play.

Note

There is one play that I wanted to bring up. The referees were able to use instantly replay multiple times in this game to correct out of bounds calls on the floor late in the 4th quarter. However, one in particular leads me to question the specifics of the rule. On a rebound of a missed free throw, Lamar Odom went up with two hands to corral the ball. With the ball already in Odom's hands, Rajon Rondo went up for the ball and ripped away Odom's left wrist forcing the ball to spill out of bounds. The referee initially called the ball out of bounds off Rondo, which was completely inaccurate. The officials went to the replay, where they are allowed to change the call of which team last touched the ball, but not anything else. So in this case, it was obvious the ball was last touched by Lamar Odom, it was blatant that Rondo fouling him is what caused the play. The referees had to award the ball to the Celtics despite this, at a big moment in the game. It troubles me that this is the case. Even if they can't call a foul after the fact, I feel like you have to be able to recognize the course of events and give the correct team the ball.

The Big Three

As we've done the previous two game, we will give the Celtics three things to work on for Game 4.

1. Obviously they need the threat of the long jumper. They didn't have it with Ray Allen on the bench in foul trouble in game one. They had it with Allen hot as hell in game two. And they didn't have it with Ray Ray cold as Ice in Game 3. I imagine you'll see Allen somewhere between his 8 3s and his 0-13. If Pierce can get free at all, that would help.

2. The Celtics need to be better on the Defensive boards. As impressive as Rondo's rebounding ability is, he cannot lead the Celtics in rebounds. Kevin Garnett needs to be stronger on the boards. He won't pull down 20 anymore, but he needs to be strong when he has the opportunities. Jeff Van Gundy has pointed out several instances of Garnett going up with one hand tipping the ball instead of pulling it down with two hands. The Celtics need Garnett to be a presence, with help from Kendrick Perkins. Big Baby has been great but he doesn't have the height to compete for the ball with the Laker big men.

3. The Celtics need to find a go to guy for late in these games. Paul Pierce has been off his game, thanks to Artest. He still might be a candidate to find the baskeball one-on-one late. He showed some signs of a late game surge tonight. Rondo doesn't have the ability to hit tough jumpers, so he is stuck trying to drive and kick. Ray Allen hasn't shown the ability to create his own shot. KG is now a candidate after a strong showing in Game 3. He was good down low and strong with the jump shot. He might be the guy for Boston to go to late. He can post up Gasol and pull Bynum out of the paint and either shoot over the top or dribble around him. The Lakers are going to have Kobe most games and showed that they have other options as well. The Celtics need to have a counter to that.

-APT

Steven Strasburg Trade Rumors?

No there is not any reality to the title of this post. As you know, Steven Strasburg makes his long-awaited Major League debut tonight. I will try my best to see the game, although I may have too many things to record. The Nationals were wise to begin his career against the Pirates. I imagine he will have a satisfactory debut against that line up. Often times, with this kind of hype, teams will start their prospect on the road, but the Nationals simply couldn't turn down the opportunity to sell out their stadium. They will get Strasburg starts at Nationals Park as often as possible for economic benefit.

Anyway, the title of this email comes from something I heard on WFAN (The New York Sports Radio station I listen to at work). Steve Phillips does a segment with WFAN's nationally renowned radio host Mike Francessa each week. Apparently, in his most recent segment, Phillips made it known that he would trade Steven Strasburg straight up for Roy Oswalt. Now, Phillips' GM abilities are widely in questions, as his tenure with the NY Mets is far more well-known for his trading Scott Kazmir for Victor Zambrano than for his drafting discovery and development of Jose Reyes and David Wright. However, Phillips was probably an average GM all-in-all and his opinion certainly merits consideration.

So let's consider it. If the Astros were to trade Roy Oswalt they would probably ask for the teams top pitching prospect, as well as another top prospect, and perhaps one or two other decent or young prospects to complete a deal. As phenomenal as everyone has already pencilled in Strasburg's career to be, we don't actually know how he is going to turn out. If any other team was asked to give there top pitching prospect for Roy Oswalt in a 1-for-1 trade, I would imagine they'd be perfectly happy to get the proven Oswalt (assuming they had the ability to try and sign him). Lost in all this hype is the fact that, as of right now, Steven Strasburg is just a prospect. Tonight he will become a Major League player and perhaps a great one. He definitely has the stuff to pitch at this level but it is certainly impossible to know if he is a hall of fame pitcher. It is impossible to know if he will ever turn out to be an ace, the way that Oswalt has been for years in Houston. In baseball, you rarely ever trade major league talent for major league talent, save a rare case of swapping bad contracts or players that have worn out their welcome. Almost all baseball trades of any consequence consist of trading multiple prospects for a proven commodity. If the Nationals had a chance to trade a single prospect (of which they are paying heavily before they even know what he can do) for a proven MLB stud. If Oswalt is not what you want, make the same argument for Doc Halladay or Johan Santana or whomever you consider to be an ace. Perhaps I wouldn't make the trade for Oswalt, but would think differently if it were a younger pitcher, like a Jon Lester or Ubaldo Jimenez. However, the reason that the Nationals CAN'T make this trade has nothing to do with talent.

The Nationals can't AFFORD to make this trade. As great as Jon Lester and Ubaldo Jimenez are, Steven Strasburg is going to sell out Nationals Park every start he makes for the next year. The Nationals can't afford to give up that kid of revenue for any type of talent. They would need trade potential revenue for potential revenue, and I don't believe there is another pitcher in baseball that can match Strazz in that statistic right now. They could get equal value back if they traded for a huge position player, as the everyday revenue might be create a positive VORP for the acquisition. That being said, I don't think Albert Pujols, Alex Rodriguez or Joe Mauer are available for a price as measley as a minor league pitcher.

I don't personally know what Steven Straburg will become. All that I am saying is neither does anyone else. No 1st overall drafted pitcher has ever one a Cy Young. I know that we scout Strazz as a pitcher that will have that kind of success, but even if we were to know that, Mark Prior, Kerry Wood and Doc Gooden all fell short of expecations for reasons that had nothing to do with raw talent. I wouldn't trade Strazz if I were the Nationals, but it shouldn't be forgotten that talent-wise he is just another propsect, whose baseball worth still needs to be proven. Economically, however, he is a beast all his own.

-APT

The Ken Griffey Jr Award

It struck me upon announcing the creation of The Isaac Bruce award that I must have been preoccupied upon mentioning Ken Griffey Jr's retirement to have not promised him the same pseudo-honor. Junior, along with perhaps Emmitt Smith, has had the single largest impact on my life as a sportsfan of any athlete. That fact makes hims largely responsible for the life of this blog. Therefore...

Let this post serve as the official announcement of the creation of Lightning in a Bottle's Ken Griffey Junior Award.

This incredibly subjective award will be given to the most popular player in baseball. This is the player whose jersey is seen on children's backs and name is heard on people's tongues in Nashville, Tacoma, Tucson, Levittown, Canton, Quebec, Tokyo and Tallahassee. It goes to the player who transcends team and is simply an ambassador of the sport to all of the fans through his play on the field. It goes to the player whose stance everyone is imitating in their backyard, whose number and position everyone is giving themselves when they create their player in MLB the Show, who is inspiring the baseball dreams that are taking shape during the year in question. Ken Griffey Jr was EVERYONE's favorite player when I was in grade school, because his play was too dynamic not to notice. Recent winners could have included Ichiro, David Ortiz, Albert Pujols, etc; though the award will officially be given out for the first time at the end of the 2010 baseball season.

-APT

Isaac Bruce

The St. Louis Rams and their newly reacquired WR, the legendary Isaac Bruce, will hold a press conference on Wednesday to announce the retirement of Bruce, who holds every major receiving record in Rams franchise history. Bruce played the past two seasons with the San Francisco 49ers, leading them in receiving in 2008-2009, but losing playing time to rookie Michael Crabtree last season. The 49ers showed their respect and consideration for Bruce by trading him back to the Rams yesterday, so that he could retire, appropriately, in St. Louis. Bruce was traded for a conditional draft-pick that will only factor-in if he were to play this season. His retirement Wednesday creates the potential for Bruce to enter the Football Hall of Fame in Canton, alongside quarterback Kurt Warner, if both are fortunate enough to be elected on their first attempt. (We hope it's the case) For more on the situation, see this article on ESPN.com.

Isaac Bruce is one of our favorite receivers here at Lightning in a Bottle and we would like to show our appreciation for his brilliant career. Not only do we wish him the best of of luck in all his future non-football endeavors, but I'd like to take this opportunity to announce that St. Louis Rams #80, Isaac Bruce, will be commemorated here at Lightning in a Bottle with the creation of the Isaac Bruce Award.

The Isaac Bruce Award will be given at the end of every NFL season to the receiver who exhibits recognizable excellence in the dragging of toes along the boundary lines to complete catches. For those that have followed Bruce's illustrious career, it should be well-known that Isaac Bruce was the single best toe/foot dragger that the NFL could boast. His proficiency in this skill has been rivaled in the past by greats like Cris Carter, and is strived for by current receivers, such as Santonio Holmes.

I'd once again like to thank Mr. Bruce for all that he has given us as fans of the sport of football, and hope that perhaps someday, he will come across this award and appreciate the very little we are able to give back to him.

-APT

Stat Lines of the Weekend

Being I sported so hard yesterday to cover the rest of the world, we'll reserve this weeks SLofW for Major League Baseball. Here we go.

THE GOOD- Mike Napoli, LAA; Sunday, 6/6 vs. Sea: 4/5, 3 R, HR, 2 RBI, K

THE BAD- Sean White, Sea; Saturday, 6/5 vs. LAA: 1.1 IP, 4 ER, 4 H, 2 BB, 0 SO

THE UGLY- Mark Teixeira, NYY; Saturday, 6/5 vs. Tor: 0/6, 0 R, 0 RBI, 0 BB, 5 K

THE GREAT- Adam Wainwright, StL; Friday, 6/4 vs. Mil: 9.0 IP, W, 0 R, 2 H, 1 BB, 8 SO

THE PERFECT- Jose Bautista, Tor; Friday, 6/4 vs. NYY: 3/3, 3 R, 3 H, 3 HR, 3 RBI

THE BIZARRE- Fredi Gonzales, Fla; Sunday, 6/6 vs. NYM: The Marlins had blown leads of 5-0 and 6-3 to the Mets. In the top of the 8th, with the score now tied 6-6, Mets 1B, Ike Davis stepped to the plate with runners on 1st and 3rd and nobody out. Marlin's manager Fredi Gonzales opted to play his IF at double-play depth. Now, sure enough, the Marlins induced a GIDP from Davis, but Angel Pagan came across with the go ahead run and the Marlins lost 7-6.


-APT

Stanley Cup Game 5

And the Blackhawks win! And, look, it's not even 1 yet (It will be when you see this). Let's take a look at what we saw in what could be a very decisive Game 5.

- The atmosphere in Chicago was excellent. These fans had been waiting forever for a moment like this. There team had been far to uncompetitive for the good of the NHL for a while, and these great original 6 fans have been cup-less for way, way too longs. It's great to hear them have something to cheer about, as they inch closer to ending the drought. SPECTACULAR job by the veteran NBC broadcast. They spoke for only about 7 seconds from the 1 minute remaining announcement to about 30 ticks after the horn sounded, to let you get feel what it was like in Chicago, as the Hawks fans screamed for the whole minute and a half.

- The Flyers did not play a bad game. The Hawks jumped out early and it ended up being too much for Philadelphia. But the Flyers all around played a solid hockey game for most of the ice time. Philly doesn't show me the kind of team that is built to come back from major deficits (goal-wise (though there was game 7 of the Bruins series)). However, the Flyers lost 7-4, so there have to be reasons why:

1. The Blackhawk forwards are no pushover. These guys are big. Marian Hossa, Patty Kane, Jonathan Toews, Dustin Byfuglien; these guys don't get pushed off the puck. They are able to control time in the Flyers zone by shielding off the big defenders and giving themselves time to make plays. Brian Gionta, Mike Cammileri, Scott Gomes; they were pushed around by the Flyer defense. The Hawks don't let that happen. They stay solid on their feet and the close control, especially of Kane and Hossa dramatically increases the offensive zone pressure.

2. The Blackhawk defensemen are not afraid. The Flyers push people around on offense too. They throw power forward after power forward at you. Mike Richards, Jeff Carter, Claude Giroux; they use their physicality to make space and get good looks at the net. The Hawks aren't backing down, even in instances when there are size mismatches. If you get in the pads of these power forwards it disrupts the rhythm of the cycling and hampers the timing of the cuts to the crease.

3. The Flyers defensemen need to be more involved on offense. The Blackhawks are using a penalty-kill type collapsible defense to combat the Flyer offense. Philadelphia dumps the puck in, pressures with a hard forecheck, and cycles around the net until they puckhandler finds space or a break to the net. The Hawk forwards are collapsing into the zone to crowd lanes and jump on pucks that squirt out of the corner. The Flyers defense is, at times, taking advantage of this in their ability to keep pucks in the zone. However, the D needs to take a more active role in the offense, right in from the rush. A defenseman should be using the seam created by the pinching wingers to generate a look from the high slot.

4. The Flyers need variation. As much as they have and will have success creating opportunities from the forecheck, at least a couple of the most important Flyer goals have come from a, still very blue-collar, offensive rush. The tying goal in game 3 and the quick goal in the second period of this game both came from the Flyers creating a quick shot off the rush, and a hard charging trailing winger pounding in the rebound before Chicago was able to get into position. The Hawks have been very disciplined on defense, but they're game plan takes a few seconds to align. The Flyers have to make opportunities of those first few seconds.

- Brian Boucher did a better job of controlling rebounds than Michael Leighton. I don't know what Peter Laviolette will do in Game 6. I imagine he will stick with Leighton. I probably would stick with Leighton if I were him. He has been solid for them when he's played. I just wanted to make the point that this was the one difference I saw in their play. Leighton also made it clear he needed to be pulled, after looking uneasy on some rather rudimentary opportunities late in the first, even though he prevented further damage.

- Ville Leino is playing great hockey in a losing effort. He had 3 assists in tonight's game, gives him 7 points in the series.

- Antti Niemi is taking care of business. He has been flashy when he needs to and simply solid when he needs to. Niemi certainly isn't taking the series over single-handedly, but he is providing the Blackhawks with exactly what they need at the precise times that they need it. He has won the high scoring game and the pitcher's duel. Niemi needs to try to either corral rebounds or guide them into the corner when the Flyers are shooting on the rush, but he is certainly putting forth some solid play, and sits just one win away from a Stanley Cup.

- The NHL uses the much better 2-2-1-1-1 system, and this will gives us a great game 6 on Tuesday. (another great move, getting the game on a different night than the NBA. This was a tough night for both, splitting the spotlight. I would think they'd want to be on the same page with that. ) Philly is going to be raucous and a blue-collar team like the Flyers should feed on that emotion. I expect a the hitting to intensify even further. Look for the Flyers fans to focus their anger on one or two of the Hawk forwards, raining boos from the rafters. If Chicago jumps out quick again, I'd be very surprised. It maybe even be a period before we see a goal. Look for the Flyers to send this back to Chicago with a hard-fought 3-2 victory.

- APT

Ci Vediamo!

Just a note to the readers.

-THE-A-TRAIN- is on vacation, off to the homeland of Italy for two weeks. I'm going to be picking up the hockey coverage for the rest of this Stanley Cup Final. I've shied away from covering too much Hockey, mostly because -THE-A-TRAIN- loves it and knows all you need to know about it. Unfortunately, I lost touch with the game after the lockout, as it came at an inconvenient time: my starting Boston College, which did not carry OLN/Vs. on their cable package. Though I try (probably unsuccessfully) not to let my biases show, I hate the Bruins and watched no hockey instead of watching them and listening to their crap NESN announcers. But I digress. So I apologize in advance that I am not 100% up to date on all of the stud youngsters that are tearing up the ice in today's younger, faster NHL; however I promise you no drop off in pound-for-pound game analysis. I love the sport and have vast experience both following and playing the game myself. I can't wait to share the experience with you of a great final.

-APT

NBA Finals Game Two

Almost caught live TV by the time this one was over. The Celtics even the series with a 103-94 win, going on a 16-4 run to end the game, after the Lakers seemed to be in position to take a commanding lead. I've got a lot to cover quickly in this game, as I have a pizza and at least 60 minutes of hockey in front of me, so let's get to it.

- I love the 24 second clock. It does wonders for the competitiveness of the end of the game. Perhaps teams don't even have a better chance to win, but the level of competition in the play at the most important part of the game is phenomenal. I wish college hoops would shorten the shot clock, maybe to 30.

- Last game I gave pretty much 3 reasons that the Lakers were able to control things, so let's see how the Celts countered each one to change the outcome:

1. Pau Gasol. The Celtics really didn't do anything to change Pau Gasol's impact on the game. He continued to be a dynamic scoring threat. He was able to help the Lakers generate offense even when Kobe was sitting in foul trouble. Kevin Garnett can't guard him. Rasheed Wallace cant quite guard hims, and Celtic big men just gave fould after foul. Gasol was great and was a big part of the reason his team was in position to win this game late.

2. Ray Allen. I don't know what the Celtics did to counter this, exactly. I believe the used Rajon Rondo on Kobe more often, but this was just a veteran knowing he needed to be on the floor in order for his team to win. Then, once he was on the floor, he did what needed to be done. Perhaps my old roommate drunkenly said it best: "Ray Allen is a fucking assassin!" Allen started 7 for 7 from 3 point range, breaking a record he shared with Scottie Pippen and Kenny Smith for 3 pointers in an NBA Finals game by draining 8. Allen not only generated scoring, he stretched the Lakers defense, leaving Rajon Rondo room to penetrate and do what Rajon Rondo does best.

3. Guards off the Bench. The Lakers bench guards completely outplayed their Boston counterparts in game 1. How did Doc Rivers cure this? He didn't use guards off the bench. Rajon Rondo didn't come off the floor until the beginning of the fourth quarter. He simply kept Rondo in the game to avoid having to use Michael Finley, and Ray Allen's ability to stay on the floor limited Tony Allen's impact. Rondo played great defense and was a single point shy of a triple-double with a couple minutes left in the 3rd quarter. Then, when Doc did need bench help, he went right to Nate Robinson, which is what he should do the rest of the series. Nate has played very well when used in the Conference Finals and this series. Nate has stayed out of dribbling trouble and also shows the Lakers a different kind of game than Rondo with his speed and his ability to shoot from outside. Nate Dawg was hitting Ray Allen a little early in his cut, so Allen was having trouble shooting of the pass with Nate on the floor, but otherwise Robinson provided a great spark for his team, until Rondo returned to...

- ...take over the fourth quarter. Rondo has put up gaudy numbers in several playoff games, but that hasn't kept fans from waiting for him to actually take over a game late when its close. This was finally Rondo's breakthrough in that regard. Rondo, offensively and defensively owned the 4th quarter. He hadn't been a big scorer early, but scored 9 in the final period. Granted, he was able to find himself open, because Kobe Bryant was forced into extra-conservative defense, playing the whole 4th quarter with 5 fouls, but Rondo still showed the killer instinct. That being said, Rondo still needs to work on his free-throw shooting. This isn't something I expect to improve this series, but it needs to be an off season focus. Also, as great as Rondo was moving the ball around after slashing to the basket, I'd like to see some earlier decisions from him, to take advantage of the Celtics spectacular...

- ...interior passing. Boston continue to show incredible touch inside. Garnett is still a great passer, as is Rasheed Wallace. The other Celtics were finishing inside, and the Lakers couldn't be quick enough. I'd love to see Boston get more chances to navigate the paint through the air. The Lakers blocked a ton of shots, and outside of Lamar Odom, picked up many fewer fouls in the paint than did the Celtics early on in the game. If the Celtics can establish what really is their inside strength, and maybe get Gasol and Bynum in foul trouble as well, they could preserve early control of the game.

- Ron Artest will certainly be overlooked in this game, as the Lakers lost, and he fouled out late (at least one very questionable foul), but he is completely shutting down the Celtics best player from the 2008 final. Paul Pierce hit his first field goal in the fourth quarter. And at the time, I believe only had 2 fouls. Artest is remarkable in his ability to get his hands in between dribbles and his arms in passing lanes without picking up cheap fouls. (Of course, after I thought this during the game, he immediately picked up 3 soft fouls and was disqualified). Though he is unable to contribute offensively in the series, the number he is doing on Paul Pierce cannot be overlooked.

- Glen "Big Baby" Davis was a joy to watch in this game. The immense infant left every last piece of himself on the floor tonight, sometimes literally. He made a couple of poor, somewhat selfish decision, but immediately redeemed himself with a major defensive play or by throwing himself to the floor in search of a loose ball. He played his heart out tonight and earned every minute he played.

- The refs are still calling this game way too tight considering the circumstances. This is the NBA Finals. Actually, this is not only the NBA Finals, but a Lakers V. Celtics NBA Finals. If you can't play physical in a Boston/LA Final, when the hell can you ever? They did a nice job avoiding an early double-technical that would have screwed Kendrick Perkins, but the tic-tack foul calls are making an impact on the level of basketball we are being allowed to see.

- This is why I hate the 2-3-2 series. Not that I think that they will, but Boston is now in position, by taking a mere 1 of 2 games on the Lakers court, to finish out this series without even seeing Los Angeles again. This handcuffs a home court team in a way that should not be permitted. Would the potential for a couple extra charter flights really trouble these players. They are getting enough days off anyway.

- Andrew Bynum is making me look bad. In a series where Lamar Odom has had trouble staying on the floor, Bynum has been a force. He had 20+ to go with (at least)7 boards and 7 blocks in the game and was able to dominate inside at times. I thought he looked crippled early in game one, but Bynum himself said that he has the most trouble early in games. Phil Jackson is giving him a chance to loosen up, and Bynum is showing what he can do.

- This was a great basketball game to watch. The Celtics won a game I think they really needed to win, even though they haven't seen home court yet. So this time, I guess we look at what the Lakers need to do to reverse their fortunes.

1. Kobe Bryant needs to stay out of foul trouble. I don't anticipate this being a major problem again. Kobe was the victim of a couple questionable foul calls and also a lack of discipline in the lane. The likelihood of a repeat of that performance is low. Kobe needs to be on the floor. Enough said.

2. Keep a body on Ray Allen. Allen was on fire, but he was going straight up clean to hit his jumpers (7 in the first half). In the second half, the Lakers were staying with him better, making it difficult for Nate Robinson to time Allen's cuts, and causing Allen to take (and miss) a couple more difficult 3s. The Lakers need to be on top of Allen from the beginning. It's possible they forgot about him, when he wasn't on the floor all of game one. Well, they better remember him now.

3. Continue to play through Gasol. Part of this is the fault of the game plan and part is the fault of the other Lakers. The team needs to look inside to Gasol late in games and when Kobe Bryant is on the floor. I understand that under 5 in the fourth with a lead is Kobe time. He is the Mariano Rivera. You want the ball in his hands to shut down an opponent and hold that lead. But until then, the Lakers can't forget about Gasol. You can tell that they aren't using him, as the Celtics big men were filling the PF line in the stat sheet in the first half, but the 2nd half didn't show the same foul stats, nor did it result in a Gasol point explosion. The Lakers have to PAUnd the ball inside to produce either one or both of these effects.

Game 3 in Boston should be one hell of a show. We know that the Celtics actually have fans come playoff time, so they will be out in numbers, and the Lakers will be out looking for blood after softening up in the clutch in Game 2.

-APT

French Open Final

So I just finished buzzing through the French Open Final. There was some dissension between myself and others about what kind of match we were in for. So, as I sit here trying to pay enough attention to Lakers/Celtics Game 2, I can tell you that I was right.

As I had said going into the later rounds of the French Open. I had seen Rafa Nadal play for a couple hours in the earlier rounds and was able to think the following: "He looks healthy again." I then told you that you could interpret that statement to read: "Rafael Nadal will win the French Open". I was certainly not kidding. Nadal is unstoppable on the clay when he is healthy, and he proved it yet again this morning, against the man who knocked a troubled, unhealthy Rafa out of the same tournament last season (the only time he's lost there).

Nadal dominated this match from about 20 minutes in. He didn't always dominate it physically. Robin Soderling is a physically imposing player. But Rafa, as he always does, especially on clay, dominated the mental aspect of the game. You don't believe you can win when you play a healthy Rafael Nadal. And if you don't believe you can win, you certainly are not going to win.

Soderling is tremendously powerful. He has a big serve, a very strong two-handed backhand, and a tremendous forehand. And he has the height and physical presence to take Nadal's high kicking top spin shot and crush them back down into the far court. He can use his power to reset points that he is behind in, and that kind of power can be effective against a Rafael Nadal that is not playing his best.

I didn't get to see the match that Soderling won last year, but I imagine that a less fit Rafa was actually able to be moved side to side effectively. From what I saw early in this match, I also figure that Soderling was able to capitalize on Nadal's shorter slice shots and deposit them into the corners. Rafa was shying away from using his slice offensively early in this match. When they were trading service games early in the first set, he was only using it on the run, to get back into points. But you could tell from the first time that he attacked Soderling with it, that the shot was just what he needed to keep the big man off balance. Between his ability to use that shot to keep Soderling teetering, and his use of the outside lines in both service courts, Rafa just had too many shots for the less versatile Soderling, who tired quickly, both mentally and physically.

Rafael Nadal, when healthy, kills your will to play the game. He is everywhere on the court, especially on clay, on which he slides so effectively. He is able to use his speed, not only to get to shots that he has no business touching, but then to reset the point by centering a slice in the opponents court and then using his speed to center himself back behind the baseline, and prepare to be everywhere once again. He punches you in the stomach time and time again, as you hit winner after winner, but end up down 0-15 by point's end. He forces you to try to hit the ball harder and harder, driving it down the opposite end of the court, but unless you are perfect, he sends it right back until you either mis-hit in an effort to strike even harder, or just lose all mental capacity to continue to compete. Nadal is one of the fittest players in the game, the quickest player in the game, and has a rarely matched ability to center his running slice-stabs. He is everywhere on the court that Lleyton Hewitt was 10 years ago, but with twice the striking ability.

Like I said, Robin Soderling is an imposing player. He has great physical ability and an excellent power game that he is able to use effectively on clay, because of his knowledge of and comfort with the surface. I expect Soderling to begin to have more success on the other surfaces as his game is refined. Look for him to be a major player at Wimbledon, this summer, as he seems to have a game that lends itself naturally to success there. The speed of the grass will help him against runners like Nadal, and perhaps give him that extra skip to beat them to the corners with out having to be line-perfect. As powerful as Robin Soderling and others like him are, however, Rafael Nadal is MORE powerful. He doesn't have the velocity on his shots that the power players do, but power becomes a relative term in tennis when you have to relate it to your opponents ability to react. Nadal's ability to react and his agility moving laterally and his accuracy on the run renders his opponent less powerful. When you compare it to the relationship of his power strokes with his opponent's movement and striking ability, he becomes the more powerful player.

I still think that Rafa needs to move the bigger players forward and backward more, as long as he can get comfortable enough cutting the ball and keeping it low, because that threat will move his opponents up just far enough that the depth of his shots will become debilitating. That being said, the way that Rafa is playing right now, if he continues to pace himself tournament-wise, you can all but pencil him in for a Wimbledon title. I know that grass is Federer's best surface, but his best surface against Nadal will always be the hard court.

Nadal handled Soderling in straight sets this morning, for his 5th French Open in 6 tries. Bjorn Borg won 6 in 8 tries. If Nadal is healthy, I truly belief he will win 7 in 8 to surpass Borg as the best clay court player tennis have ever seen. Nadal turned 24, I believe, earlier this week. He may win 10 French Opens by the time he's done, but we'll have to see how his legs hold up. Nadal was able to serve right with the more powerful Soderling, as the two finished even in aces, or close to it, with Rafael Nadal double-faultless, first-serving at an outrageous 78%. Soderling had more than his share of chances to break Nadal early in the match. Nadal saved a chance that would have put him down the first break and then saved several chances that the Swede had to gain serve back later in the set. Soderling strained to save a double-break at 2-4, but couldn't eek out a break in the next game, despite his opportunities. By halfway through Set 2, Soderling's will started to break. Nadal broke him early and late in the set, and after going up the double break, the match was as good as over. Soderling held serve in the third all but once, with the help of a more conservative Nadal, who collapse onto the clay, covering his back in brown, as he has been known to do upon completing a championship. For the second time in three years, Nadal finished the tournament without dropping a set, and reclaimed his right to the Roland Garros throne.

-APT

BIG TIME SPORTS SUNDAY

Hello all:

I was away for the weekend seeing my brother graduate college. But no worry, as I DVR everything that matters. Today is/was a HUGE Sunday of sport, and I'll still be there to follow it all for you. I'm going to give you delayed instant (WHAT?!) analysis of all the major goings on. Instant in that I will report immediately after the games/matches are over, but delayed in that I'm watching them all on DVR. No time for commercials, no time for listening to any body else's analysis first. So, perhaps you don't agree with what I say, but at least it'll be original. Forgive me for not being able to throw stats at you, but I don't want to risk spoiling the other events for myself and I don't make any money, so I can't employ a fact checker. To start, a quick review of the Williams College Graduation.

- The name reader was too slow
- The commencement address giver was horrible. He was inefficient, to self-involved, gave advice that I actually prefer the students of Williams not live by, and then concluded his speech by contradicting his point with a quote by a much brighter, better known author (Kurt Vonnegut Jr.).
- The second student speaker was spectacular
- Of the four sandwiches at the free lunch, they rank in this order:
1. Egg Salad
2. Chicken Salad
3. Veggie
4. Tuna Salad

And now for sports!

-APT

Hottest Little Potatoes

HLP BATTERS

Robinson Cano, NYY: 16/28, 10 R, 3 2B, 3 HR, 13 RBI, 2 BB, 2 K

Miguel Cabrera, Det: 13/27, 8 R, 2 2B, 6 HR, 11 RBI, 2 BB, 5 K

Troy Glaus, Atl: 9/23, 8 R, 2 2B, 4 HR, 13 RBI, 5 BB, 4 K


HLP PITCHERS

Matt Cain, SF: 17.0 IP, 14 K, CG, 2 W, 0.53 ERA, 0.47 WHIP

Yovani Gallardo, Mil: 16.0 IP, 11 K, CG 2 W, 0.56 ERA, 1.06 WHIP

Felix Hernandez, Sea: 16.0 IP, 16 K, W, 1.13 ERA, 0.94 WHIP


A LOT of great pitching this past week, so I imagine disappointment will abound upon the release of this week's HLP. To try to help temper this, I give you...

HLP Honorable Mention

Cliff Lee, Sea
Johan Santana, NYM
Derek Lowe, Atl
Edwin Jackson, Ari
David Price, TB
Chris Carpenter, StL


-APT

NBA Finals Game One

Some final thoughts on Game One. The Lakers were actually the MORE physical team in this game. If they continue to be more physical than the Celtics, this series will not last long. Ron Artest brings that presence to the Lakers. He seems to have made the other Lakers players tougher. The first half of this game, Pau Gasol carries his team with stellar play at both ends, but it was Kobe Bryant who took over, when the game was up for grabs in the 3rd quarter. The Lakers were +11 in the 3rd. There defense was just a little tighter, and Kobe was hitting Kobe-shots. The Celtics struggled to find freedom among LA's defenders and I think a lot had to do with a lack of 3 point presence. Ray Allen spent most of this game on the bench and the Celtics didn't really have another threat with Artest locked on Pierce. The Celtics made a small run early in the 4th, but you could tell the Lakers wanted it more.

I believe the Lakers are the better team in this series, but not by a whole lot. If the Celtics outwork and out-hit the Lakers, they can easily be the dominant team on the floor, but the Lakers matched Boston today in all the intangible categories. If they continue to do so, the Kobe-advantage will continue to shine through.

A positive for the Celtics was the play of Nate Robinson. He was able to stay with the quick guards for LA, where Michael Finley was not. Nate also looked composed handling the ball most of the time, and as the broadcast team pointed out, used his extended dribbling to create looks for his teammates instead of himself. Look for his playing time to increase as this series wears on.

Defensively, I don't know what else the Celtics can do. They should have the size and ability to guard LA straight up with occasional help on Kobe. However they need to play physical, and they need to be quicker inside. Gasol was all over KG in the post. The Lakers didn't even take advantage of that as much as they could have. I'm interested to see how the officiating progresses in this series. I think it took a little away from this game. There were a lot of soft fouls. That could have had a negative impact on the Celtics defense.

I think the Celts will come out intense in Game 2. It's up to LA not to get complacent like they did against the Oklahoma Cities. Something tells me that the Lakers inability to forget 2008 will make them sure to come out firing again in GAme 2.


Here at Lightning in a Bottle, we strive to give you immediate analysis of the most important sporting events in America and abroad (when we're not being lazy or on vacation). So to prove this, I'll be doing a running diary of Game 1 tonight via twitter. Come back later tonight, post game, and I'll put up the entire thing right...



11:53:00 Dozed off for a minute as this game comes towardst he end. 1-0 LA

The Celtics just have to work so hard to get an open look late in this game. They can't turn down open looks when you are down this many

The Celtics letting Kobe in there for the offensive rebound shows that little bit of edge in the fight dept that has meant a lot in this one

You can find this running diary there at the completion of the game. Also stay tuned for a fresh serving of Hot Little Potatoes

I hope you're all checking in on the blog at www.boltinabottle.blogspot.com

But instead a huge play by Artest on the Defensive end. That is why he is here. And all of the sudden momentum is back with the home team

We've stalled here at 13 points and some clock has ticked away. The Celtics need a quick run to get this under 10

Jordan Farmar has had a big influence on this game in limited minutes. That can be a big story in this series

This graphic reminds us that 12 teams did not pick Kobe Bryant in the 1996 draft

That rapping mice commercial was certainly weird.

Nate Robinseon's quickness on the dribble is allowing him to make things happen even from the perimeter and the Celts can cut it to 11

Lead down to 15. Now is the time if there is one

Sheed seems to have picked up the intensity but an unfortunate mishandle between he and Nate

The Lakers look for a spark with Nasty Nate on the floor to start the 4th

Defensively, you just have to take your chances getting the ball out of Kobe's hands and hoping the other Lakers are missing

If Rondo can step up (he's been accused of fading in 4th quarters before) and get back into the paint, they can use the drive and k4 pts

The Celts have had sequences where they've gotten stopped, but without Allen stretching the floor, the collapsing Laker D has struck back

Bos needs Ray Allen on the floor shooting. he's a veteran. It'll be up to him to play conservatively and avoid the fould

So we end the 3rd quarter now in a 20 point game. The Celtics are in a lot of trouble if they don't make a run early. How do they do it?

Fisher makes 100 bucks taking the charge. JVG again brings up the lack of 3 point shooting without Allen (Ray)

Terrible job by Rasheed Wallace with a Technical Foul here. He gives the Lakers a free point, and now it's a 17 point game at a bad time

I agree with Van Gundy about going back to 2-2-1-1-1. If you have home court, and drop 1, you can be quickly dismissed. I'm not a fan

The 3rd quarter has been a big one for Kobe all playoffs as he now has 14 in this 3rd quarter

FIVE fouls now on Ray Allen. He was barely back on the floor. The Celts try to argue it Big Baby's foul

Actually I stand corrected they are now up 13

Somehow the Lakers turned that trading of turnovers into momentum, without actually increasing their lead.

Great court presence by fisher to find Bryant after a tough pass to handle from Artest

Rondo continues to show how comfortable he is in the paint. you may see Bynum and Odom both on the floor at poiints in this series

KG really starting to feel the jumper now. That could be big if the Celtics are to make up ground

Gasol not going to let that flop go unanswered though,a s he goes hard on the offensive boards for a big bucket.

Pau Gasol is surely in the World Cup spirit, as the Spaniard goes flopping, but is called for the foul

The Celtics putting a little pressure on here int he full court. They know they can't let Kobe go into closer mode when the 4th starts

A new comedy with Will Ferrell and Mark Wahlberg? There goes $10.

Good idea to take the quick time out here by Doc. The Celtics can't let the Lakers go on a run here.

Second look seems he might have got an elbow to the upper body, which should be less of a factor

Rondo came up lame on that last sequence. I think it might be in the quad area. We'll have to keep an eye on it

Big block by Tony Allen. We have had multiple 24 second calls as both teams are playing defense with high intensity

The trade of Eddie House comes to mind to, as Ray Allen sits on the bench. These Celtics are going to need some room to operate

The forgotten part of Posey's game that is no longer with the Celtics is their ability to stretch the half court shooting 3s.

Ray Allen picks up his FOURTH. That will be big, taking away his shooting, and his ability to run defenders all over the court

Beautiful move by Rondo, as he navigates around 3 lakers in the paint. That is where he is at his best

Kobe Bryant is daring Rondo to shoot a long 2 or 3. We'll see if he starts trying it out as this goes on

Another very soft foul called by the officials, and Fisher picks up his 3rd as well. Ray Allen's 2 FT are sure to go down easy

All 10 starters on the floor, so we'll have to watch the fouls. Perkins and Artest already have added foul number 3

And we'r back, Fisher bringing it up the floor, Byum gets the foul but the ball rolls off the rim...eventually...

The other story of the 1st half, Jordan Farmar and Shannon Brown heavily outplaying Nasty Nate and especially Michael Finley

His foot quickness court vision on offense, and his discipline on defense have made him a force in this first half. to the 2nd half!

The story of the first half is Pau Gasol. He is the difference in this game. Gasol had to play major minutes with Lamar Odom in foul troub

50-41 at the half. The game has certainly been competitive and physical, though the officials have had a big part in taming it

BIG shot by Rondo to send this game to 1/2

The Celtics hold for pretty much last shot, but the Lakers have a foul to give. They'll have a couple seconds to shoot

And there he is again, doing what 2008 Rondo couldn't, showing a beautiful short jumper
about 2 hours ago via web
Big bucket by Fisher, who seems spritely since returning, and we see a double digit lead just as the Bolt joins the live programming

Big Throwdown as Boston tries to stop the Laker momentum, with KG running the floor

His positioning is so sound and KG does not have the quickness anymore to shake him. Gasol is too disciplined to go for simple fakes

Pau Gasol has been phenomenal defensively!

of all people, it's Ron Artest that runs up 5 straight points, and the Lakers finally see some separation.

The teams exchange interior defensive feats before Kobe draws a foul down the Celtic's end. NBA playoff basketball is top notch

Time is just disappearing as we stay in this Lakers by 2-4 area. Big chance here for LA to extend after a big Defensive stand

Big shot from KG. If he can get confident shooting, that would be big. He obviously didn't have the moves to gain separation from Gasol

Andrew Bynum taking my criticism to heart and playing with a renewed fervor in the 2nd quarter

Congratulations to Ray Allen on his 1 millionth shot dropping clean through the net off a screen

The Lakers showing they can pass inside, though they don't have the same hands in there with Bynum on the floor. He comes up big here

Would love to see a jumping contest between Nate and Shannon Brown. Maybe that will be the halftime show

REALLY soft foul on Nasty Nate in the backcourt. This game is being called incredibly type. That will be trouble with the physical play

Ray Allen needs to stay out of foul trouble. He makes a big difference wearing out the Laker defenders

The Lakers had trouble scoring at times without Kobe against Phx, but the young guards are changing that

Sheed far more effective against Gasol than KG, but no one can stay in front of Shannon brown. He and farmar have been a nice spark

HUGE 3rd foul on Lamar Odom, as I've been heavily critical on Bynum

Rondo misses both free throws. That's something he is going to need to work on a lot this off season if he wants to be the top PG

Rondo doing a great job on the boards. Seems the Lakers early on are more willing to use their bench than they were in the Suns series

Rasheed Wallace opening the bank after hours

Here is Nate Dawg already to start the 2nd, just like I advised Doc. Van Gundy points out that they probably have not played 2gether much

That and the fact that the refs are calling a real tight game. I believe 2 players a side have 2 fouls already.

So after one quarter the only thing that really sticks out is that the Lakers are matching the Physical intensity

These guards off the bench from LA are so quick. You might see more Nate Robertson than Michael Finley as this series wears on

That's a huge 2nd foul on Kobe Bryant. It was definitely a bump, even though Pierce was hooking a little. PP back to the line

If I ever need my knee drained, I want to go to Kobe's knee draining guy

For those that are unsure, feel free to continue to refer to Glen Davis as Big Baby. Doc Rivers was on PTI and gave us all the okay.

Phil Jackson strongly emphasized taking charges in practice this week. According to a report I read, Pau Gasol just made himself 100 bucks

A lot of missed free throws early for the Lakers. I imagine that'll level out ast he game goes on. Big play by Gasol, taking the charge

Very poor choice by Tony Allen on the interior pass, followed by a very athletic play by Odom to force some free throws

Always easy to find Shannon Brown when he is flying 5 feet above the ground.

2 fouls on Ron Artest and Kobe Bryant will guard pierce, Farmar on rondo. I actually don't mind Farmar or Brown on Rondo

Lamar Odom instantly making himself known on the floor

Game 2 is not until Sunday!!! And they are not even Travelling! the NBA continues to be ridiculous

Great interior passing by the Celtics. That'll cause foul trouble for Bynum with his limited lateral mobility

Paul Pierce out to prove there is more than one sharp shooter on the floor in this series

Awesome story about Doc hiding the money of the players in the staples center, and here they are to get it back

Gasol is going to be a tough matchup for KG's old knees in this version of Lakers/Celtics

Rajon is going to have Kobe running all over the half court. We'll see how many open looks he gets when Kobe gets lazy away from the ball

Especially when Odom is on the floor, the Lakers are so versatile: inside to outside. But Rondo is showing his new balanced game.

Andrew Bynum looks like a statue. Only a matter of time before Odom. Big early shot for artest

artest already a defensive presence with an early steal

two early fouls. could be a problem for the offense, but the lakers have plenty of offense. sasha should be a big boost defensively

Have to agree with jeff van gundy. no need for double techs on that play

and it takes about 30 seconds for Paul Pierce and Ron Artest to go out it. This will certainly be an interesting battle.

and the tip off for bolt is at 9:28. Just a slight delay on DVR. we'll be up to speed in no time


-APT